Executing Heart Failure Care Between Visits
Review real-world outcomes from 747 heart failure patients supported through ISHI's protocol-driven care model.
Read Case StudyClinical Evidence
Evidence for Care Between Visits
Clinical evidence, case studies, and operational results demonstrating how structured care delivery can improve execution between specialty visits.
Featured Evidence
Featured Clinical Evidence
Explore the Clinical Evidence Brief and heart failure case study supporting ISHI’s approach to active management between visits.
Transforming Heart Failure Care Through Active Clinical Management Between Visits
Explore the clinical problem, the care model, and the operational framework behind active management between visits.
Read Evidence BriefClinical and Operational Results
Heart failure care executed at scale
In a real-world evaluation across community cardiology practices, ISHI demonstrated that structured virtual care workflows can support high-volume intervention without increasing cardiologist burden.
747Heart failure patients included in the evaluation
2,013Clinical alerts managed through structured workflows
99%Clinical alerts addressed within 48 hours
15.5%Improvement in beta-blocker utilization
0%Escalated to community cardiologists
What the Evidence Shows
From visibility to execution
Remote monitoring, virtual care, and care management programs can improve access to information. The evidence focus for ISHI is whether care plans are consistently acted on between visits.
Improved GDMT utilization
Protocol-driven care drove measurable improvement across all four GDMT classes: beta-blockers, ACEI/ARB/ARNI, SGLT2 inhibitors, and MRA.
Rapid alert management
Clinical alerts were managed at volume, with 99% addressed within 48 hours through structured escalation pathways.
No added cardiologist burden
The majority of alerts were handled by the multidisciplinary team, with no escalation required to community cardiologists in the evaluation.
Clinical Evidence Resources
Available resources
Use these resources to understand the clinical rationale, care delivery model, and real-world outcomes behind ISHI’s approach to active management between visits.
Executing Heart Failure Care Between Visits
Review real-world outcomes from 747 heart failure patients supported through ISHI's protocol-driven care model.
Read More →Transforming Heart Failure Care Through Active Clinical Management Between Visits
Explore the clinical problem, the care model, and the operational framework behind active management between visits.
Read More →Explore the Resource Center
Browse ASM education, clinical evidence, case studies, and insights from the complete ISHI Resource Center.
Explore Resource Center →Continue Exploring
Evidence in context
Clinical evidence is one part of the broader ISHI Resource Center. Explore the ASM framework and insights that explain why execution between visits matters.
Ready to Review the Evidence?
Start with the Clinical Evidence Brief or review the heart failure case study to see how structured care delivery can support execution between visits.
Read Evidence Brief